mike i agree with you about the what you saying about the police spending most of their time on relatively minor things. these are however revenue producing offenses that most people will not contest. yeah i agree with you about the recovering of stolen property. and even if they did recover your stolen property, they will not return it to you unless you can prove without a doubt that it is yours.
the point i was trying to make is that if you live in a city that is large you are screwed. the only person looking out for you is you. that is why i do not live in a city anymore. although i live in the country, and i see a sheriff out here maybe once a month, i do feel much more safer out here. actually, the only reason i lock my front door is that the neighbors 4yo comes to my house quite often and lets himself in, and with me not having children of my own, my house is not kid proof. otherwise i could probably get away without locking the doors.
when i lived in kalama washington (pop 1800 at the time) i never lock my front door. also, when i lived there, i would often drive into downtown and leave the keys to my jeep on the floorboard for 2 or 3 days at a time and i never had to worry. the police in that small town were very proactive about crime and the reason for this was that everybody knew them (3 full time officer and 3 reserves) and if there had been a crime problem, they knew the city would have no problem replacing them with ones that could. also they never went after you for petty vs (ie tail lights out, seat belts etc.).
in large cities the police have motivation for there to be a high crime rate. the higher the crime rate the larger the budget. sure they will solve the major news making crimes that make the news to make them look competition, but they let the minor ones go so they can feel justified in asking for more money. but like you said mike, they sure seem to have all time in the world to go after those revenue producing infractions.