http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/personal/08/11/stay.at.home.moms.economy.ap/index.htmlThousands of generations of women lived just fine without driving around everywhere.
When my kids were little, my wife followed along with her yuppie friends, and as a result, my kids never learned something as basic as being able to cross the street until they were WELL into their teens. It was jaw-dropping. They drove EVERYWHERE--a few blocks away and they'd get into the car.
Well that was partly because they didn't feel safe on foot on the streets. But also partially because she was mimicking the behaviors of her friends, who did almost everything outside of the home.
In the 1980s this city was full of all sorts of businesses catering to mother-child social groups.
Lady Lilya would be horrified. There were virtually no unstructured activities (such as are supposed to train the executive functions of the brain). Nobody was able to socialize, without participating in some sort of commercial activity!!!
The article is about a problem that isn't. These women should not be feeling "trapped", but instead should be organizing and visiting with the neighbors.
As for the economics of stay-at-home moms, well, in an inflationary, high-tax system, you want to produce as much value as you can yourself, and opt out as much as possible from the outer economy. They should be cooking instead of eating out, organizing their own recreation (playing games, inviting the neighbors over for tea), mending clothing to make it last as long as possible, doing things by hand rather than machine to reduce costs, etc.